До проблеми соціокультурних вимірів соціально-філософського мислення в умовах глобалізаційних викликів
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Анотація
Introduction. The transition to a new type of society (post-industrial) on a global scale sharply raises the problem of preserving human-dimensional socio-cultural processes and life worlds of different types of communities, and the necessity for them to make a socio-cultural choice in situation of scientific and technological achievements and transformations. Purpose. The aim of the study is to identify the socio-cultural aspects of social and philosophical thinking based on the analysis of modern approaches to social globalization changes. Methods. The research is based on the methods of socio-cultural analysis of social reality and reinterpretation of the theoretical achievements of modern social thinkers on the basis of the principles of objectivity, historicity, inter-subjectivity. Originality. That is, scientific and technological development will contribute to realization of ideals of freedom and justice or promote the realization of consumer values and individualism. It will also influence on the approval of foundations of a new social-philosophical thinking aimed at both the identification of crisis situations and challenges, and the transformation them into the points of socio-cultural renewal. This is especially true of our Ukrainian socio-cultural reality and society as a whole which finds oneself in the situation of an important civilization breakdown, socio-cultural paradoxes, crisis of social identity and formation of forms of public society. Conclusion. In this study the social -philosophical thinking is considered as such one which is aimed at real maintenance of constitutive factors of any social community through the identification of interdependences and interrelationships. It is also a necessary factor of the mechanism of social interaction and a peaceful instrument of social order, and a factor of realization of integrate needs of a person and a whole society as well. Thus, social-cultural reception of the phenomenon of social-philosophical thinking is aimed at preserving of socio-constructive potential under the modern conditions of global risks and dangers.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Посилання
Berdiaev, N. A. (1993). On setting of man. Moscow: Respublika (in Russ.)
Fukuiama, F. (2005). Large crash. Human nature and proceeding in a social order. Lviv: Kalvariia (in Ukr.)
Popovych, M. V. (1997). Rationality and measuring of human existence. Kyiv: Sfera (in Ukr.)
Kastels, M. (2000). Informative epoch: economy, society, culture. Moscow: HUVShE (in Russ.)
Bauman, Z. (2002). Individualized society. Moscow: Lohos (in Russ.)
Berher, P., Lukman, T. (1995). Social constructing of reality. Treatise on sociology of knowledge. Moscow: Medium (in Russ.)
Shtompka, P. (2005). Sociology: analysis of modern society. Moscow: Aspekt-Press (in Russ.)
Ynhlkhart, R. (2000). Post-modern: changing values and changing societies. Retrieved from: http: // www.Sociology.mei-phi.ru/docs/polit html/ing.htm
Vallerstain, Y. (2003). End of the acquainted world: Sociology of ХХІ century. Moscow: Lohos (in Russ.)
Knefelkamp, L. Lee (2008). Civic Identity: Locating Self of Community. Diversity & Democracy, II, 2, 1-3. Retrieved from: www.diversityweb.org/Diversity Democracy/vol.11.no 2.pdf.
Andros, Ye. A. A problem of freedom in the context of rationalization of human existence. Man in civilization of ХХ of century : problem of freedom. Kyiv: Naukova dumka (in Ukr.)