GENDER, WRITING AND IDENTITY: FROM FEMINITIV TO GENDER METAPHYSICS

Main Article Content

Pavlo КRETOV
Olena КRETOVА

Abstract

Introduction. The relevance of the topic is determined by the search for modern philosophy, linguistics, social philosophy and psychology in the problem area of gender studies, which, with consistency, leads to cross-cutting themes of philosophical anthropology. Purpose of the study. The aim of the study is to determine the correlation between modern philosophical projects of narrative and object-oriented ontology in the context of the problematic philosophy of a thing, the concept of an object. Methods used in the study: text analysis of sources, analytical methods to consider philosophical discourse, hermeneutic approach and problematization of the difference between language and speech. The results of the study make it possible to state the uncertainty of the metaphysical grounds of gender theory in general and gender linguistic research, social programs and strategies in particular. Also, the paradigmly criterion of gender positioning and identity formation, which manifests itself in the social philosophy of gender and gender studies of the language, is unclearly articulated. The originality and novelty of the research is that an attempt has been made to outline the interdependence of philosophical ideological knowledge in its metaphysical interpretation and gender theory as a set of socio-cultural practices, programs and strategies. Also, the conditionality of representations about gender identity and its manifestations from the metaphysical grounds of the world picture is clarified. The results of the study are related to its multidisciplinary nature and consist in the argumentation of the need to rethink the role of the metaphysical component in modern gender theory, which determines the nature of specific gender studies, in particular those that touch on the issues of modern cognitive linguistics, social and practical philosophy, theory of communication.

Article Details

Section
PHILOSOPHY OF CULTURE, AESTHETICS, PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION

References

Doane, B. (2016). Aesthetics, Ethics, and Objects in the Anthropocene. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 44, 1/2, 336-338.

Arkhangelska, A. M. (2013). The problem of word-forming feminization in the Ukrainian language of the modern era: tradition and modernity. Movoznavstvo (Linguistics), 6, 27-40 (in Ukr.)

Dmitriev, S. V. (2015). Cognitive-onomasiological analysis of personality nominations in modern Ukrainian socioclats: dissertation ... Ph. D. 10. 02.01 – Ukrainian language. Odessa. Retrived from: http://onu.edu.ua/pub/bank/userfiles/files/science/rada%20philology/%D0%94%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D1%96%D1%94%D0%B2_%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%81.pdf. (in Ukr.).

Sinchak, O. (2017). Gender-based languag : vectors of power and influence. Gender for media. Textbook on gender theory for journalism and other socio-humanities specialties, 117-135. Kyiv: Criticism (in Ukr.)

Verbovska, M. (2015, December 26). Five reasons to use feminist. Respect. Campaign against sexism. – Retrived from: http://povaha.org.ua/pyat-prychyn-vzhyvaty-feminityvy/ (in Ukr.).

Kristeva, Y. (2004). The Woman Is Never Such. Polylogue, 454-460. Kyiv: Univers (in Ukr.)

Sinchak, O. (2009). Rhetorical significance of role-based dexis in women's autobiographical discourse («Field studies on Ukrainian sex» by O. Zabuzhko). Humanitarna osvita u vyshchykh navchal’nykh zakladakh (Humanitarian education in higher educational institutions), 17. Retrived from: http://jrnl.nau.edu.ua/index.php/go/article/view/2314 (in Ukr.)

Pagutyak, G. (2010). Those who drowned in the snow. Lviv: Pyramid (in Ukr.)

Ekonen, K. (2014). Kristeva before Kristeva: Gender and Creativity in Russian Symbolism. Studies in the Literary Imagination, 47, 1, 149-166; Butler, K. (2014). Kristeva, Intertextuality, and Re-Imagining «The Mad Woman in the Attic». Studies in the Literary Imagination, 47, 1, 129-147.

Bleich, D. (2013). The Materiality of Language: Gender, Politics, and the University. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press

Witt, C. (2011). The Metaphysics of Gender. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kimmel, M. (2008). Masculinity as homophobia: fear, shame and silence in the construction of gender identity. Enjoyment of being a man: Western theories of masculinity and post-Soviet practices, 38-58. St. Petersburg: Aleteya. (in Russ.).

Dichkovskaya, G. O. (2008). Internal-semantic structural scheme of political and ideological systems. Gilea, 16, 233-246 (in Ukr.)

Huizinga, J. (1997). Homo ludens; Articles on the history of culture. Moscow: Progress-Tradition (in Russ.)

Marcinyuk, T. (2017, February 2). The Role of Men in Combating Gender Violence (US Case Study). Gender in Detail.. Retrived from: https://genderindetail.org.ua/season-topic/genderne-nasilstvo/rol-chol-u-bor-iz-gender-nasil-na-pr-sha-134039.html (in Ukr.)

Mudrik, A. B. (2014). Gender competence of personality: theory, diagnostics, development. Lutsk: Tower-Print (in Ukr.)