NARRATIVE VERSUS OBJECT-ORIENTED ONTOLOGY: THE CONCEPT OF THINGS AND THE PERFORMATIVE MODEL OF SPEECH
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction. The relevance of the topic is determined by the search for modern philosophy in the problem field of ontology and epistemology, which, with consistency, lead to cross-cutting themes of philosophical anthropology. Purpose of the study. The aim of the study is to determine the correlation between modern philosophical projects of narrative and object-oriented ontology in the context of the problematic philosophies of a thing, the concept of an object. Methods used in the study: text analysis of sources, analytical methods for the consideration of philosophical discourse, hermeneutic approach, and problematization of the difference between language and speech. The results of the research allow us to state that the anthropocene situation in philosophy appears as a syntagmatic, methodological and semantic center of a new picture of the world. This intention is also related to a new interpretation of the myth in the grandnarrative of civilization and proceeds not from the model of reduction to myth, reduction to the archetypal one, but accentuates the formative, monolithic, ontologizing potential of the myth. Originality and novelty of the research lies in the fact that the project of narrative ontology, rooted in the analytical tradition, and the project of object-oriented ontology, rooted in the continental tradition of philosophizing, are compared. The role of speech as an implicit performative act for the ontologization of the human world in modern philosophy is also justified. The findings of the study are due to its multidisciplinary character and mainly consist of the substantiation of the thesis about the essential connection between the projects of narrative and object-oriented ontology and the search for modern philosophy of language, philosophical anthropology, ontology and epistemology. The performative character of speech is considered in connection with the rethinking of the concepts of thing and object in the aforementioned philosophical projects.
Article Details
References
Minakov, M. A. (2005). Hermeneutic experience and its role in the analysis of culture. Multyversum. Filosofskyi almanakh (Multiverseum. Philosophical Almanac), 45. Kyiv: Center for Spiritual Culture. Retrived from: https://www.filosof.com.ua/Jornel/M_45/Minakov.htm (in Ukr.)
Dao and telos in the sense dimension of cultures of the eastern and western types (2011). Vladivostok: Publisher of the Far Eastern Federal University (in Russ.).
Morton, T. (2013). Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Mn.: University of Minnesota Press; Doane, B. (2016). Aesthetics, Ethics, and Objects in the Anthropocene. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 44, 1/2.
Vogler, K. (2015). Travel writer. Mythological structures in literature and cinema. Moscow: Alpina non-fiction (in Russ.)
Benson, C. (2013). III. Acts Not Tracts! Why a Complete Psychology of Art and Identity Must Be Neuro-Cultural. Consciousness, Literature & the Arts, 32;. Tome, D., Schmid, W., Kaufmann, V. (2017). Invasion of life. Theory as a secret autobiography. Мoscow: Higher School of Economics (in Russ.)
Assman, A. (2017). «The connection of times disintegrated?» The rise and fall of the temporal regime of Modern. Moscow: New literary review (in Russ.)
Susov, I. P. (2009). Linguistic pragmatics. Vinnitsa: The New Book (in Russ.)
Barker, S. (2004). Renewing Meaning: A Speech-Act Theoretic Approach. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
Sloterdijk, P. (2002). Critique of Cynical Reason. Kyiv: Tandem (in Ukr.)
Nancy, J.-L., Morin, M.-E. (2016). Ego Sum: Corpus, Anima, Fabula. New York: Fordham University Press.
Rudnev, V. (2016). A new model of reality. Moscow: Higher School of Economics (in Russ.)
Freidenberg, O. M. (1998). Myth and the literature of antiquity. Moscow: Publishing company «East Literature» of the Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russ.)
Knyazeva, E. (2014). Enactivism: a new form of constructivism in epistemology. Moscow: University book (in Russ.)
Agafonova, E. V. (2006). Narrative ontology as an opportunity for a new conceptualization of being. Paradigm: essays on philosophy and theory of culture, 6, 232-244. St. Petersburg: Publishing house S.-Petersburg. University. Retrived from: http://fsf.tsu.ru/wp_test/wp-content/uploads/publications/agafonova_ev /narrat_ontology1.pdf (in Russ.).
Meretoja, H. (2014). Narrative and Human Existence: Ontology, Epistemology, and Ethics. New Literary History, 45, 1, 89-109. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Currie, M. (2013). The Unexpected: Narrative Temporality and the Philosophy of Surprise. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Owen, H. (2011). Bakhtinian Thought and the Defence of Narrative: Overcoming Universalism and Relativism. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 7, 2.
Kenaan, H. G. (2005). The Present Personal: Philosophy and the Hidden Face of Language. New York: Columbia University Press; Bernaerts, L., Herman, L., Vervaeck, B. (2013). Stories and Minds: Cognitive Approaches to Literary Narrative. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Danto, A. (2002). Analytical Philosophy of History. Moscow: Idea-Press (in Russ.)
Leontiev, D. A. (2003). Psychology of meaning: nature, structure and dynamics of semantic reality. Moscow: The meaning (in Russ.)
Harman, G. (2015). The four-object: Metaphysics of things after Heidegger. Perm: Gile Press (in Russ.)
Kralechkin, D. (2014). About sealing wax and cabbage. Logos, 4 (100), 293-318 (in Russ.)
Lobanov, S. D. (2015). On the concept of a thing, or a thing-oriented philosophy. Vestnik Vyatskogo gos. guman. un-ta (Bulletin of the Vyatka State Humanitarian University), 12, 13-19 (in Russ.).
Harman, G. (2012). On Substitute Causality. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (New Literary Review), 2 (114). Retrived from: http://www.nlobooks.ru/node/1997 (in Russ.)
Sycheva, S. G. (2007). Martin Heidegger about a thing, a symbol and thinking. Vestnik Tomskogo gos. un-ta (Bulletin of the Tomsk State University), 297, 84-91 (in Russ.)
Zhinkin, N. (1998). The thing. Logos, 1, 68-102 (in Russ.)