Some aspects of exemplification role in the context of sign systems

Main Article Content

Elena Astapova-Vyazmina

Abstract



One of the major problems in sign system is the way of denotation. Any character included in the system, has certain characteristics taking into account the opportunities of its combination with other characters (inscriptions, utterances) of the system. Signs are always directly related to subjects they denote. However, we should always remember that symbols are associates with both verbal and non-verbal ways of denotation. The latter include, for example, the pictorial image, motion or gesture. The level of abstractness in sign systems complicates denotation process itself. How, for example, should one show the cold character of a subject or express joy in non-verbal system of denotation? Is the expression of certain emotions equivalent to emotions themselves and is it always possible to change their expression into their illustration? Syntactic, semantic and pragmatic aspects are compulsory for constructing the scheme of any sign system. The main problem is rooted not in the plane of construction, but in the plane of functioning of the given system in which exemplification as a way of symbolizing, proposed by Nelson Goodman in notation theory, plays a key role.

Article Details

Section
PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS OF LOGIC

References

Normal

0

false

false

false

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

/* Style Definitions */

table.MsoNormalTable

{mso-style-name:"Обычная таблица";

mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;

mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;

mso-style-noshow:yes;

mso-style-parent:"";

mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;

mso-para-margin:0cm;

mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;

mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

font-size:10.0pt;

font-family:"Times New Roman";

mso-ansi-language:#0400;

mso-fareast-language:#0400;

mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

1.          Avgustin Blazhennyj. Hristianskaya nauka, ili Osnovaniya svyashchennoj germenevtiki i cerkovnogo krasnorechiya /Avgustin. – K.: Tipografiya Kievo-Pecherskoj Lavry, 1835. – 355 s.

2.          Gudmen N. Sposoby sozdaniya mirov / Nel'son Gudmen. –  M.: Ideya-Press, Logos, Praksis, 2001. – 376 s.

3.          Delez ZH. Frehnsis Behkon: Logika oshchushcheniya / ZHil' Delez. – SPb.: Machina, 2011. – 176 s.

4.          Kandinskij V. V. O duhovnom v iskusstve / Vasilij Kandinskij. – M.: Arhimed, 1992. . – 107 s.

5.          Kuajn U. O. Referenciya i modal'nost' // Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. – Vyp. 18. Logika i lingvistika (problemy referencii) / Uillard Van Orman Kuajn. – M.: Raduga, 1982. – S. 87-108.

6.          Myuller V. K. Novyj bol'shoj Anglo-russkij slovar' / Vladimir Myuller. – M.: Al'ta-Print, 2009. – 864 s.

7.          Patnehm H. Znachenie i referenciya // Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. – Vyp. 18. Logika i lingvistika (problemy referencii) / Hilari Patnehm.  – M.: Raduga, 1982. – S. 377-390.

8.          Petrov V. V. Filosofskie aspekty referencii // Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. – Vyp. 18. Logika i lingvistika (problemy referencii) / V. V. Petrov. – M.: Raduga, 1982. – S. 406-414.

9.          Semiotika: Antologiya / Sost. YU. S. Stepanov. Izd. 2-e, ispr. i dop. – M.: Akademicheskij Proekt; Ekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga, 2001. – 702 s.

/* Style Definitions */

table.MsoNormalTable

{mso-style-name:"Обычная таблица";

mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;

mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;

mso-style-noshow:yes;

mso-style-parent:"";

mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;

mso-para-margin:0cm;

mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;

mso-pagination:widow-orphan;

font-size:10.0pt;

font-family:"Times New Roman";

mso-ansi-language:#0400;

mso-fareast-language:#0400;

mso-bidi-language:#0400;}

10.          Goodman N. Languages of Art: An Аpproach to a Тheory of Symbols / Nelson Goodman. – NY.: Bobbs-Merrill Company, 1968. – 277 p.

11.        Goodman N. Metaphor as Moonlighting / Nelson Goodman // On Metaphor, ed. by S. Sacks. – Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1978. – P. 175-180.