CATEGORY OF MIMESIS IN ASCETIC AND ASTHETICAL DISCOURSE OF BYZANTIUM

Andrii TSARENOK

Abstract


Introduction. Thorough exploring of Byzantine aesthetics of the asceticism should be connected with exploring of its important categories Mimesis (imitation) represents one of the most remarkable concepts, which scientists find in ascetic and aesthetical discourse. Purpose. The aim of this article is to make a general survey of Byzantine ascetic and aesthetical theory of human mimetic (imitative) activity. Methods. Using the scientific methods of generalization, systematization, hermeneutical analysis of cultural traditions, the author tries to point out the peculiarities of Orthodox ascetic and aesthetical doctrine of imitation. Results. Having analysed the corresponding statements of famous Byzantine ascetics, the author points out that doctrine of mimesis exists in two dimensions (aspects) of aesthetics of the asceticism – 1) in the dimension of theological interpretation of arts and 2) in the aesthetical and ethical dimension, which is connected with understanding of the human being beauty. On the one hand, the theologians of Byzantium develop the mimetic conception of arts, on the other, – they preach the necessity of mystical mimesis – the imitation of God, of God and Man Jesus Christ and of saints. Originality. Pointing out some remarkable features of mentioned preaching, the author underlines the reality of strong aesthetical character of Christian East ascetic doctrine. Conclusion. Category of mimesis should be regarded as an important concept of Byzantine aesthetics of the asceticism. First of all, Christian ascetics, like philosophers of ancient world, consider arts as imitation of different objects of reality. Moreover, according to Orthodox theologians, ascetic way as the highest art represents the imitation of God. Due to this mystical mimesis a person renews true and natural beauty of his or her inner world and fulfils purpose of his or her existence.


Keywords


Byzantine aesthetics of the asceticism; mimesis; arts; asceticism; imitation of God

References


Tatarkevich, V. (2001). History of six concepts: Arts. Beautiful. Form. Creation. Imitation. Aesthetic experience. Kyiv: Univers (in Ukr.)

Yuhymyk, Y. V. (2011). Aesthetical and art studies analysis of mimetic way of artistic creation: historic dynamics of classic arts (Dissertation). Kyiv (in Ukr.)

Tsarenok, A. V. (2016). The Aesthetical Aspect of the Byzantine Asceticism: a general survey. Filosofija i politologija v kontekste suchasnoji kultury (Philosophy and politology in the context of modern culture), 4 (13), 133-142.

Grigoriy, Bogoslov, st. (2010). The Selected Works. Moscow: Izd-vo Sretenskogo Monastyria (in Russ.)

Grigoriy, Nisskiy, st. (1863). Works in 8 volumes, 5. Moscow: Tipografia T. Gotie (in Russ.)

Grigoriy, Nisskiy, st. (1866). Works in 8 volumes, 8. Moscow: Tipografia T. Gotie (in Russ.)

Grigoriy, Nisskiy, st. (1861). Works in 8 volumes, 2. Moscow: Tipografia T. Gotie (in Russ.)

Bychkov, V. (1991). Little History of the Byzantine Aesthetics. Kyiv: Put’ k Istine (in Russ.)

John Panteleimon, Manussakis (Archimandrite) (2014). God after Methaphysics. The Theological Aesthetics. Kyiv: DUH I LITERA (in Russ.)

Zarin, S. (1996). Asceticism according to the Orthodox Doctrine: the Ethical and Theological Study. Moscow: Palomnik (in Russ.)

Grigoriy, Nisskiy, st. (1865). Works in 8 volumes, 7. Moscow: Tipografia T. Gotie (in Russ.)

Isaac, Sirin, st. (2012). Ascetic words. Moscow: Lepta Kniga; Simferopol’: Rodnoje Slovo (in Russ.)

Vasiliy, the Great, st. (2007). Letters. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo Podvor’ja Sviato Troitskoj Sergievoj Lavry (in Russ.)

Vasiliy, the Great, st. (2009). Works, 2. Moscow: Sibirskaya Blagozvonnitsa (in Russ.)


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Archive
2014 11 31
2015 11 31
2016 1 2
2017 1 2

User

Journal Content

Browse

Language